色www,五月婷婷深爱五月,午夜国产一级片,色噜噜综合,国产大胸无码视频,清纯美女被操黄网站在线观看,波多野结衣av高清一区二区三区

и ԭt

r(sh)g2020-08-27 10:03:14 иԇ ҪͶ

и ԭt

1 Ҋʲôxʲôԭt

и ԭt

ԓԭt顰TOEFL ʮSԭt֮?yn)ŴԭtĻA(ch)֮

(bеĵطy,ԓԭtm(dng)ѭ.)

2؏(f)ԭt

 ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eעЩ؏(f)ʸߵ~?yn)؏?f)ʸߵĖ|҂ ߵע⡣иĜyԇ҂@ЩӢZڶZԵETSĿc(din)ҲֻЩ҂ԣͨ^Ŭ ĵط

Bonus:

С؏(f)ߵ~ܾܿ@(g)ӵ}TOPIC

3hԭt

 ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eעЩнhx~Y(ji)(gu)?yn)oՓ߀njԒhĵطh(yun)c(din)

Multiply:

vTOEFL ĽhY(ji)(gu)R

1You should

2I suggest / I propose / I recommend

3proposal / tips / suggestion / advice/ recommedation

4had better do sth. / be better off doing sth.

5How about? / What about?

6Why not? / Why dont you?

7If I were you, I would/ I wouldnt

8Would it make things go faster if you?

9Maybe / Perhaps you

10) How does sound?

4 (qing){(dio)ԭt

է ȥ(qing){(dio)ԭt@úܻ\y(tng)䌍(sh)wɷ֞ɴZx(qing){(dio)Z⡢Z{(dio)(qing){(dio)

Zx(qing){(dio)x(qing){(dio)ጏ(qing){(dio)e(qing){(dio)e(qing){(dio)Y(ji)Փ(qing){(dio)ȏ(qing){(dio)N

ZZ{(dio)(qing){(dio)(qing){(dio)ͣD(qing){(dio)(qing){(dio)N

҂́һһՓvZx(qing){(dio)֧

1x(qing){(dio)

  ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eעЩxϾͽo҂𺳻|(dng)~Y(ji)(gu)磺Especiallyһ~ă(ni)һǿc(din)?yn)ͱʾ?ǡwF(xin)ETSġ˼롱ٱ磺new theory܇Ҳһڿc(din)?yn)@wF(xin)ETSġ˼롱Еr(sh)ETS鏊(qing){(dio)ij߀һЩO@Ҋı_(d)ʽ҂ 磺indeedãcertainly(dng)ȻJust rememberһҪӛAnd again.fһ飩special featureMost importantlyҪǣOne thing I should mentionґ(yng)ԓἰǡMake / Be sure toһҪȵĺx(qing){(dio)~߀Լeۺw(hu)

2ጏ(qing){(dio)

 ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eעЩxώ |(zh)~Y(ji)(gu)磺, which is / that isǾf@Ȼwhich is / that is(do)ĶZľETSֹ҂ ǰă(ni)ݣƧ~ȥÁM(jn)һԽጵ@NԵĶZľ (dng)Ȼͳˏ(qing){(dio)c(din)ڵҪ(bio)־ƵĽY(ji)(gu)硰What I mean isAll that means isȵȲöe

3e(qing){(dio)

  ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eעЩee|(zh)~Y(ji)(gu)磺for example硭?yn)ӿȵ׶öETS֪˺eȻҲǰĸȻٿǰĸ Ҳ@c(din)@Ȼԭtơ@NeeʽĽY(ji)(gu)Ҳˏ(qing){(dio)c(din)ڵҪ(bio)־ƵĽY(ji)(gu)硰for instancesuch asnamelyas an exampletake example for ȵȲöe

4e(qing){(dio)

  ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eעЩмe^^߼|(zh)~Y(ji)(gu)磺much higher thanȡߵöࣩ?yn)б^^c(din)^c(din)ǿc(din)@Nмe^^߼|(zh)~Y(ji)(gu)Ҳ˱c(din)ڵҪ(bio) ־ƵĽY(ji)(gu)߀С-er-estmoremostmostlyfirstl(f)astmajority(sh) ɣminorityٔ(sh)ɣabove allҪǣȵee

5Y(ji)Փ(qing){(dio)

 ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eע ЩнY(ji)ՓY(ji)|(zh)~Y(ji)(gu)磺I concluded thatҵĽY(ji)ՓǡɷJ(rn)Y(ji)ՓZﶼҪ@NнY(ji)ՓY(ji)|(zh)~Y(ji)(gu)Ҳ(bio)־c(din)ĴƵĽY(ji)(gu)߀ conclusionsummarizemake a summaryY(ji)in brieffin short֮in a word֮in a conclusionfinallyall in allto sum upȵee

6ȏ(qing){(dio)

 ӕr(sh)߀Ҫ؄eעЩЌ|(zh)`~Y(ji)(gu) 磺compare tocȣ@NЌ|(zh)~Y(ji)(gu)Ҳ(bio)־c(din)܇ƵĽY(ji)(gu)߀Сunlike󣩡similar tocƣin contrast tocգdifferentlyalike󣩡resembleƣon the other handinsteadl(f)ikewisein the same wayȵȡ

vZZ{(dio)(qing){(dio)֧

1(qing){(dio)

 ӕr(sh)҂ (hu)R(sh)ע Щxص~Y(ji)(gu)?yn)got our attentionץס҂ע@ETS܏(qing){(dio)ͻwF(xin)ڱ؞鿼c(din)

2ͣD(qing){(dio)

һ(g)xúúõģͻȻһ(g)ͣD^һNŻ֏(f)^@NȻֹĬF(xin)؄e҂עͬҲ_(d)ETS get attentionĿɞ鱾܏(qing){(dio)һͻwF(xin)ͣDڱ؞鿼c(din)ڡ

3(qing){(dio)

ԓ (qing){(dio)ʽ[?yn)?sh)һNֵ뷨J(rn)  ĵط(hu)(hu)ЩƧy֮̎Բϧr(sh)g;ȥ yyc(din)xs·ŗѽ(jng) ĵطҪӛTOEFLǵڶZԜyԇ(hu)]ԡƧڡԑ(yng)҂ҕ߀Щ x׶֮̎ӛ֮̎һǿc(din)ڡ

5ԭt

 ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eעЩx~Y(ji)(gu)?yn)oՓ߀njԒĵطh(yun)c(din)(bio)־~ֿɼ(x)֞ԭͽY(ji)

Multiply:

vTOEFL Y(ji)(gu)R

ԭ:

1because

2because of

3due to

4since

5as

6for

7The reason is

8Thats why

9By reason of

10 Owing to

Y(ji):

1so

2so that

3therefore

4thereby

5hereby

6thus

7As a result

8consequently

9hence

10accordingly

6D(zhun)ԭt

 ӕr(sh)߀Ҫ؄eעЩD(zhun)ۺx~Y(ji)(gu)?yn)oՓ߀njԒD(zhun)۵ĵطh(yun)c(din)

Multiply:

vTOEFL D(zhun)Y(ji)(gu)R

1but

2however

3nevertheless

4while

5yet

6unless

7except for

8actually

9in fact

10) To tell you the truth

11)practically

12)virtually

13)as a matter of fact

7ԭt

 ӕr(sh)߀Ҫ؄eעЩһһԆԴʽľӻY(ji)(gu)}͕(hu)鿼}}Ļشǿc(din)_𰸵ij̎

8_^ԭt

 ӕr(sh)Ҫ؄eע 塰_^һɾԒTOPIC}(hu)@һF(xin)}؞鿼c(din)

9βԭt

ͬ߀Ҫ؄eע 塰ӽY(ji)r(sh)һɾԒCONCLUSIONY(ji)Փ(hu)@һF(xin)Y(ji)ՓҲ؞鿼c(din)

10ԭt

ӛ ӕr(sh)ՓĿƶ߀ƶֻҪF(xin)ĵطc(din)?yn)һ}(hu)@(g)˵ĵλúؕI(xin)ʺ֮̎؞鿼c(din)

ʮԭtҴvc(din)ՄĸX҂ԇ\(yn)һȽoһ(g)Ո?jin)?0(ni)ͨ^Ѹْѿܕ(hu)}ĵطԭЄ_ʼ

[2000.1.4750]

Questions 47-50. Listen to the beginning of a lecture given by a history professor.

Good morning, class. Before we begin today, I would like to address an issue that one of you reminded me of after the last lecture. As you may recall, last time I mentioned that Robert E. Pierre was the first person to reach the North Pole. What I neglected to mention was the controversy around Pierres pioneering accomplishment. In 1910, a committee of the national geographical society examined Comeydore Pierres claim to have reached the North Pole on April 6th 1909 and found no reason to doubt him. This judgment was actually confirmed by a committee of the US congress in 1911. Nevertheless, Pierres claim was surrounded by controversy. This was largely due to the competing claim of Doctor Frederic Cook who told the world he had reached the Pole a four-year earlier. Over the decades Pierre was given the benefit of the doubt, but critics persisted in raising questions about his navigation and the distances he claimed to have covered. So the Navigation Foundation spent an additional 12 months of exhaustive examination of documents relating to Pierres polar expedition. The documents supported Pierres claims about the distances he covered. After also conducting an extensive computer analysis of photos taken by Pierre at the pole, they concluded that Pierre and his companions did in fact reach the near vicinity of the North Pole on April 6th, 1909. OK, today were going to talk about exploration of the opposite end of the world. I assume you all read chapter 3 in our text and are now familiar with the names: Emerson and Scott.

OKҰѿc(din)ôwӰ(bio)ㄝÌ

Good morning, class. Before we begin today, I would like to address an issue that one of you reminded me of after the last lecture._^ԭt As you may recall, last time I mentioned that Robert E. Pierre was the first person e(qing){(dio)ԭtto reach the North Pole. What I neglected to mentionx(qing){(dio)ԭt was the controversy around Pierres pioneering accomplishment. In 1910, a committee of the national geographical society examined Comeydore Pierres claim to have reached the North Pole on April 6th 1909 and found no reason to doubt him. This judgment was actually confirmed by a committee of the US congress in 1911. Nevertheless, D(zhun)ԭtPierres claim was surrounded by controversy. This was largely due to ԭtthe competing claim of Doctor Frederic Cook who told the world he had reached the Pole a four-year earlier. Over the decades Pierre was given the benefit of the doubt, but D(zhun)ԭtcritics persisted in raising questions about his navigation and the distances he claimed to have covered. So ԭtthe Navigation Foundation spent an additional 12 months of exhaustive examination of documents relating to Pierres polar expedition. The documents supported Pierres claims about the distances he covered. After also conducting an extensive computer analysis of photos taken by Pierre at the pole, they concluded that Y(ji)Փ(qing){(dio)ԭtPierre and his companions did in factD(zhun)ԭt reach the near vicinity of the North Pole on April 6th, 1909. OK, today were going to talk about exploration of the opposite end of the world. I assume you all read chapter 3 in our text and are now familiar with the names: Emerson and Scott. βԭt

ągģ

Ϻá҂_ʼ֮ǰһϹ(ji)nһλͬW(xu)oһ(g)} _^ԭtゃ߀ӛϹ(ji)nf^Robert E. Pierreǵһ(g)e(qing){(dio)ԭt_(d)Oқ]ᵽ^x(qing){(dio)ԭtPierre@ΚvU(xin)ɾ͵ĠՓ1910һ(g)ҵW(xu)(hu)СM ˡComeydore Pierre190946յϱOc(din)Ĉ(bo)l(f)F(xin)]ɑijɹ@(g)Q(hu)1911ͺˌ(sh)ˡȻD(zhun)ԭ tPierreijɾͅsɆ@?yn)飨ԭtFrederic Cookt(y)Pierre4굽_(d)Oc(din)ԺPierreٍˑɵıǣD(zhun)ԭtu҈(jin)֌߷߾x ɆԭtI(lng)(hu)12(g)µyr(sh)gPierreĚvU(xin)ļ֧Pierre·̵˴X PierreڱOc(din)ĵƬԺY(ji)ՓY(ji)Փ(qing){(dio)ԭtPierreĻ邃(sh)HϵĴ_D(zhun)ԭt190946յ_(d)˱Oc(din) ҂ҪӑՓһ(g)Oc(din)̽Ҳゃx^еĵԺһEmersonScott@ɂ(g)ֲİ˰βԭt

и ԭtP(gun)£

и 俼ԭt11-22

и }ԭtͽ}˼·11-21

P(gun)и ߴԭt11-23

и }·c}ԭtЩ11-22

2017и }ԭt08-20

и yԇߴԭt11-21

и 08-23

и ָ08-17

иZ(f)ԭt06-16